Skip to content
Research/Prp Prf/PRF Facial Rejuvenation

PRF Facial Rejuvenation

Platelet-rich fibrin for skin quality and volume support. Therapy administered via injection/microneedling.

Intelligence Profile

Research Papers

Current research on PRF (platelet-rich fibrin) facial rejuvenation is emerging but limited, with most published studies being review articles and case reports rather than controlled clinical trials. No clinical trials were identified in the evidence provided.

Review Studies:
Several comprehensive reviews have examined PRF applications in facial aesthetics. A 2026 systematic review in the Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology specifically compared platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) for periorbital rejuvenation, though specific findings and sample sizes were not detailed in the available abstracts. Additional systematic reviews published in Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America and Facial Plastic Surgery examined broader applications of both PRP and PRF in facial plastic surgery and periorbital aesthetics.

Case Reports and Clinical Applications:
The available evidence includes several case reports describing specific PRF applications:

  • A novel treatment combining injectable PRF with Endolift laser for facial rejuvenation was reported as a case study in Clinical Case Reports
  • Applications for periocular rejuvenation using PRF gel were documented in Facial Plastic Surgery
  • A case report described using injectable PRF for superior sulcus hollowing, published in the Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology

Mechanistic Research:
One study in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery examined PRF as "an endogenous bioregulatory modulator" for coordinating soft tissue remodeling, suggesting potential biological mechanisms for its rejuvenative effects.

Evidence Limitations:
The current evidence base consists primarily of review articles, case reports, and mechanistic studies rather than controlled clinical trials. No randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, or other higher-level evidence were identified. This limits the ability to draw strong conclusions about PRF's effectiveness, optimal protocols, or comparison to other treatments for facial rejuvenation. More rigorous clinical research is needed to establish the safety and efficacy profile of PRF for facial aesthetic applications.

Free account required

Research papers requires a free AXIFI account to access clinical data, safety profiles, and research papers.